{"id":1306,"date":"2023-01-06T08:23:17","date_gmt":"2023-01-06T07:23:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/uncategorized\/rittenregistratie-niet-zonder-adressen\/"},"modified":"2026-03-03T10:34:25","modified_gmt":"2026-03-03T09:34:25","slug":"trip-registration-not-without-addresses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/rittenregistratie-niet-zonder-adressen\/","title":{"rendered":"Trip registration not without addresses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A trip log, which does not include the addresses of departure and destination, does not meet the legal requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Declaration of no private use<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This is decided by the District Court of The Hague in a <a href=\"https:\/\/deeplink.rechtspraak.nl\/uitspraak?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:11324\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">case<\/a> In which the Inland Revenue, at the request of the employee\/driver of a passenger car, issued a <em>declaration of no private use<\/em> has issued. The Inland Revenue issues such a statement on request to employees with a company car. In the request to issue the statement no private use, the employee declares not to drive more than 500 private kilometres with the car on an annual basis. On the basis of the statement, the employer waives the deduction of payroll taxes on the private use of the car.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In principle, if it turns out afterwards that the car did drive more than 500 private kilometres, the additional tax assessment (with interest and penalty) lands on the employee's doormat. The employer can only be confronted with the additional tax assessment if the employer knows that the statement issued by the employee to the Tax Administration regarding the private use of the car is incorrect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to the <em>declaration of no private use<\/em> exists the <em>declaration of exclusive business use<\/em>. This statement can only be issued for a van. This van is then allowed to drive 0 (zero) private kilometres.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Burden of proof<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The tax authorities can require an employee. to whom a no private use certificate has been issued, to show that the car is used for private purposes for no more than 500 kilometres on an annual basis. \u201c<em>Shows<\/em>\u201d involves a heavy burden of proof, namely that the employee <em>must convincingly demonstrate<\/em> That he did not drive more than 500 private kilometres with the car.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Trip registration<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Proof can be provided with a trip registration, but the limited private use may also prove otherwise. In the case before the Court, the employee provides proof with a trip registration. However, the Court ruled that the trip registration did not meet the requirements for it. These requirements can be found in <em><a href=\"https:\/\/wetten.overheid.nl\/jci1.3:c:BWBR0028236&amp;hoofdstuk=3&amp;artikel=3.13&amp;z=2023-01-01&amp;g=2023-01-01\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 3.13 of the Payroll Tax Implementation Regulations 2011<\/a><\/em>. That provision states that the trip registration <strong>per individual journey<\/strong> must include at least the following information:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>date;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>start position and end position of the odometer;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>start address and end address;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>route driven if it differs from the most common one;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the character of the ride.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The court ruled that the submitted trip log did not meet these requirements:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>addresses of starting points and destinations missing;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>when the route driven differed from the most common route, this was not mentioned;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>fixed distances are noted for common journeys.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, the Tax Office notes that the odometer readings on garage receipts submitted by the employee do not match the readings in the trip log.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The employee also argues that he did not know he had to keep such accurate trip records. The court considered that this was the employee's responsibility. After all, he wanted to make use of a tax benefit. It is then up to him to familiarise himself with the conditions, such as having to keep accurate trip records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Default penalty<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The additional assessment of payroll taxes was accompanied by a default fine of \u20ac1,328 (later reduced to \u20ac531). A default fine can be imposed on the basis of the simple fact of having failed to pay payroll taxes (the maximum default fine in the relevant year is \u20ac5,278). Only in the absence of all fault (avas) can a default penalty be taken off the table. Again, the Court considered that there was no question of avas because the employee could be expected to look into the conditions of the tax-favourable scheme he applied.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Een rittenregistratie, waarin de adressen van vertrek en bestemming niet zijn opgenomen, voldoet niet aan de wettelijke eisen. Verklaring geen priv\u00e9gebruik Dat beslist de Rechtbank Den Haag in een zaak waarin de Belastingdienst op verzoek van de werknemer\/berijder van een personenauto een verklaring geen priv\u00e9gebruik heeft afgegeven. Een dergelijke verklaring geeft de Belastingdienst op verzoek [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1306"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3318,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1306\/revisions\/3318"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vwg.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}